Fine Art Society

The Fine Art Society are art dealers in New Bond Street in the West End of London since 1876. The gallery pioneered exhibitions by a single artist, including James McNeill Whistler in 1880.

Layers

Coordinates

Latitude: 51.511662135180
Longitude: -0.143834351620

View on the COVE Master Map

Timeline of Events Associated with Fine Art Society

Grosvenor Gallery inaugural exhibition

May 1877

Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872Whistler exhibits eight oil paintings, including Nocturne in Black and Gold: The Falling Rocket, at the inaugural exhibition of the Grosvenor Gallery, established by Sir Coutts Lindsay and his wife as a venue for art of the Aesthetic and Pre-Raphaelite schools. Image: Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872 (Detroit, Michigan, Detroit Institute of Arts). This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Julie Codell, “On the Grosvener Gallery, 1877-90″

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″

Ruskin attacks Whistler in Fors Clavigera

2 Jul 1877

Portrait of John RuskinRuskin attacks Whistler and his paintings in the pages of Fors Clavigera, writing that “[f]or Mr. Whistler’s own sake, no less than for the protection of the purchaser, Sir Coutts Lindsay ought not to have admitted works into the gallery in which the ill-educated conceit of the artist so nearly approached the aspect of willful imposture. I have seen, and heard, much of Cockney impudence before now; but never expected to hear a coxcomb ask two hundred guineas for flinging a pot of paint in the public’s face.” Image: Portrait of John Ruskin. This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Julie Codell, “On the Grosvener Gallery, 1877-90″

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″

Whistler's libel action against Ruskin

28 Jul 1877

Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872On 28 July 1877, Whistler initiated a libel action against Ruskin. Image: Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872 (Detroit, Michigan, Detroit Institute of Arts). This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Julie Codell, “On the Grosvener Gallery, 1877-90″

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″

Whistler-Ruskin trial opens

25 Nov 1878

Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872Law suit for libel opened on 25 November 1878 at London’s Courts of Justice, with Whistler as litigant, claiming damages of £1000 from Ruskin. The verdict was awarded to Whistler after a trial lasting eight hours (the jury deliberated for another two), but as importantly, Whistler was awarded only one farthing in damages and no costs. Image: Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872 (Detroit, Michigan, Detroit Institute of Arts). This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Julie Codell, "“On the Grosvener Gallery, 1877-90″

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″

Whistler’s “10 O’Clock” lecture

20 Feb 1885

Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872On 20 Feb 1885, James McNeill Whistler gave his “10 O’Clock” lecture, Piccadilly, London, attacking social use of art. Part of a longer battle that included Whistler’s libel suit against John Ruskin in 1878; Whistler did not name Ruskin but alluded to a Philistine “Sage” who misled the public on art. Image: Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872 (Detroit, Michigan, Detroit Institute of Arts). This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Amy Woodson-Boulton, “The City Art Museum Movement and the Social Role of Art”

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″

Grosvenor Gallery inaugural exhibition

Ruskin attacks Whistler in Fors Clavigera

Whistler's libel action against Ruskin

Whistler-Ruskin trial opens

Whistler’s “10 O’Clock” lecture

1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
TimelineJS
Date Event Manage
May 1877

Grosvenor Gallery inaugural exhibition

Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872Whistler exhibits eight oil paintings, including Nocturne in Black and Gold: The Falling Rocket, at the inaugural exhibition of the Grosvenor Gallery, established by Sir Coutts Lindsay and his wife as a venue for art of the Aesthetic and Pre-Raphaelite schools. Image: Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872 (Detroit, Michigan, Detroit Institute of Arts). This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Julie Codell, “On the Grosvener Gallery, 1877-90″

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″
2 Jul 1877

Ruskin attacks Whistler in Fors Clavigera

Portrait of John RuskinRuskin attacks Whistler and his paintings in the pages of Fors Clavigera, writing that “[f]or Mr. Whistler’s own sake, no less than for the protection of the purchaser, Sir Coutts Lindsay ought not to have admitted works into the gallery in which the ill-educated conceit of the artist so nearly approached the aspect of willful imposture. I have seen, and heard, much of Cockney impudence before now; but never expected to hear a coxcomb ask two hundred guineas for flinging a pot of paint in the public’s face.” Image: Portrait of John Ruskin. This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Julie Codell, “On the Grosvener Gallery, 1877-90″

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″
28 Jul 1877

Whistler's libel action against Ruskin

Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872On 28 July 1877, Whistler initiated a libel action against Ruskin. Image: Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872 (Detroit, Michigan, Detroit Institute of Arts). This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Julie Codell, “On the Grosvener Gallery, 1877-90″

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″
25 Nov 1878

Whistler-Ruskin trial opens

Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872Law suit for libel opened on 25 November 1878 at London’s Courts of Justice, with Whistler as litigant, claiming damages of £1000 from Ruskin. The verdict was awarded to Whistler after a trial lasting eight hours (the jury deliberated for another two), but as importantly, Whistler was awarded only one farthing in damages and no costs. Image: Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872 (Detroit, Michigan, Detroit Institute of Arts). This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Julie Codell, "“On the Grosvener Gallery, 1877-90″

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″
20 Feb 1885

Whistler’s “10 O’Clock” lecture

Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872On 20 Feb 1885, James McNeill Whistler gave his “10 O’Clock” lecture, Piccadilly, London, attacking social use of art. Part of a longer battle that included Whistler’s libel suit against John Ruskin in 1878; Whistler did not name Ruskin but alluded to a Philistine “Sage” who misled the public on art. Image: Self-Portrait of James McNeill Whistler, Arrangement in Gray: Portrait of the Painter, c. 1872 (Detroit, Michigan, Detroit Institute of Arts). This image is in the public domain in the United States because its copyright has expired.

Articles

Amy Woodson-Boulton, “The City Art Museum Movement and the Social Role of Art”

Nicholas Frankel, “On the Whistler-Ruskin Trial, 1878″