I found the capstone presentations incredibly engaging today in class! In particular, I enjoyed listening to all the different facets of these stories and hearing all these perspectives and arguments I would have never considered before today I think this speaks to the level of malleability that these Victorian texts have and how their literary illustrations are open to a multitude of interpretations with each according critical focus. For instance, I thought it was really interesting that both me and Kyle shared a similarity in our thesis with the connection to Charles Darwin, or how each capstone project for Sherlock Holmes: The Man with the Twisted Lip was analyzed for differing story elements, such as viewing opium as a form of capital. Or although there was a large group that did Goblin Market, each version highlighted the importance of meaning-making within these texts.
Regarding all these different versions of the text definitely offered me a larger perspective on how editions change over time and often the substance of the story develops as well, bringing forth this idea I have about how literature is not as static of a form as I once believed. It is a form with a variety of observations to be made, different artist interpretations, and various approaches to examine the content. I thoroughly enjoyed the connective space this class offered towards being able to cultivate these ideas and different understandings to broaden my comprehension of Victorian literature and illustrations.
Comments
"Literature is not a static form"
Submitted by Lorraine Kooistra on
Great take-away!